Original Article
Agrobiodiversity, Composition and Functional Characteristics of Homegardens in Bhimtal Block of Nainital District, Uttarakhand, India
Year: 2020 | Month: June | Volume 13 | Issue 2
1.Abebe, T. 2005. Diversity in Homegarden Agroforestry Systems of Southern Ethiopia. Wageningen University, the Netherlands, Tropical Resource Management, pp. 59.
View at Google Scholar2.Alam, M.S. and Masum, K.M. 2005. Status of homestead biodiversity in the offshore Island of Bangladesh. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 1: 246-253.
View at Google Scholar3.Alfred, M. 2009. Traditional homegardens and rural livelihood in Nhema, Zimbabwe: a sustainable agroforestry system. International Journal of Sustainable Development World Ecology, 16: 1-8.
View at Google Scholar4.Amberber, M., Argaw, M. and Asfaw, Z. 2014. The role of homegardens for in situ conservation of plant biodiversity in Holeta Town, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6(1): 8-16.
View at Google Scholar5.Bijalwan, A. 2012. Structure, Composition and Diversity of Horticulture Trees and Agricultural Crops Productivity under Traditional Agri-Horticulture System in Mid Hill Situation of Garhwal Himalaya, India. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3: 480-488.
View at Google Scholar6.Black, C.A. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 15-72.
View at Google Scholar7.Das, T. and Das, A.K. 2005. Inventorying plant biodiversity in homegardens: A case study in Barak Valley, Assam, North East India. Current Science, 89: 155-163.
View at Google Scholar8.Devi, N.L. and Das, A.K. 2012. Diversity and utilization of tree species in Meitei homegardens of Barak valley, Assam. Journal of Environmental Biology, 34: 211-217.
View at Google Scholar9.Devi, N.L. and Das, A.K. 2012. Diversity and utilization of tree species in Meitei homegardens of Barak valley, Assam. Journal of Environmental Biology, 34: 211-217.
View at Google Scholar10.Farooquee, N.A. and Saxena, K.G. 1996. Conservation and utilization of medicinal plants in high hills of the central Himalayas. Environ. Conserv., 23: 75-80.
View at Google Scholar11.Forest survey of India (FSI). 2015. The state of forest report, Dehradun, FSI, Ministry of environment and forests, Govt of India, New Delhi, pp. 40.
View at Google Scholar12.High, C. and Shackleton, C.M. 2000. The comparative value of wild and domestic plants in homegardens of a South African rural village. Agroforest. Syst., 48: 141-156.
View at Google Scholar13.ISFR. 2017. Indian State of Forest Report. Prakash Javadekar, Ministry for Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
View at Google Scholar14.Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prantice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 186-192, 195-196.
View at Google Scholar15.Kehlenbeck, K., Arifin, H.S. and Maass, B. 2007. Plant diversity in homegardens in a socio-economic and agro-ecological context. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Zeller M, Guhardja E, Bidin A (eds) Stability of Tropical Rainforest Margins, Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp. 295-317.
View at Google Scholar16.Kumar, B.M. and Nair, P.K.R. 2004. The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, 61: 135-152.
View at Google Scholar17.Kumar, V. and Tiwari, A. 2020. Importance of Homegardens Agroforestry System in Tropics Region. In book: Biodiversity, Conservation and sustainable Development (Issues & Approaches). Prithwiraj Jha, New Academic Publishers, New Delhi (in press).
View at Google Scholar18.Kumar, V. and Tiwari, A. 2018. Importance of tropical homegardens agroforestry system. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 6(9): 1002-1019.
View at Google Scholar19.Kumar, V. and Tripathi, A.M. 2017. A holistic approach for assessing the vegetation composition and functional changes of tropical homegardens: Prospects and challenges. In: Gupta SK, Panwar P, Kaushal R (eds), Agroforestry for increased production and livelihood security, published in NIPA, New Delhi, pp. 475-505.
View at Google Scholar20.Kunhamu, T.K., Ajeesh, R. and Kumar, V. 2015. Floristic analysis of peri-urban homegardens of southern Kerala, India. Indian Journal of Ecology, 42(2): 300-305.
View at Google Scholar21.Kusumlata and Bisht, N.S. 1991. Quantitative analysis and regeneration potential of moist temperate forest in Garhwal Himalaya. Indian J. For., 14(2): 98-106.
View at Google Scholar22.Muhammed, N., Masum, F.H., Hossain, M., Chakma, S., Oesten, G. and Detten, R.V. 2011. Floral composition and biodiversity conservation in Homestead forests in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 1: 1-11.
View at Google Scholar23.Negri, V. 2009. Possible incentives to home garden maintenance: comparing possibilities and raising awareness among farmers. In: Proceedings of a workshop on crop genetic resources in European home gardens. Bioversity International, pp. 72-80.
View at Google Scholar24.Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. (Black, C.A., Ed). Madison, WIS. American Society of Agronomy, pp. 1044-1046.
View at Google Scholar25.Rana, P., Tewari, S.K. and Kumar, V. 2016. Floristic Structure, Composition and Functional Characteristics of Homegardens in Garhwal Region, Uttarakhand, India. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 9(6): 1049-1059.
View at Google Scholar26.Roy, B., Rahman, Md. H. and Fardusi, M.J. 2013. Status, Diversity, and Traditional Uses of Homestead Gardens in Northern Bangladesh: A Means of Sustainable Biodiversity Conservation. International Scholarly Research Notices Biodiversity, pp. 1-11.
View at Google Scholar27.Sahoo, U.K., Rocky, P., Vanlalhriatpuia, K. and Upadhyaya, K. 2010. Structural diversity and functional dynamism of traditional homegardens of North-East India. The Bioscan., 1: 159-171.
View at Google Scholar28.Saikia, P., Choudhury, B.I. and Khan, M.L. 2012. Floristic composition and plant utilization pattern in homegardens of Upper Assam, India. Tropical Ecology, 53: 105-118.
View at Google Scholar29.Sankar, S. and Chandrashekara, U.M. 2002. Development and testing of sustainable agroforestry models in different agroclimatic zone of Kerala with emphasis on sociocultural, economic, technical and institutional factors affecting the Sector. KFRI Research Report 234. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala.
View at Google Scholar30.Saroj, P.L. and Dadhwal, K.S. 1997. Present Status and Future Scope of Mango Based Agroforestry Systems in India. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 25(2): 118-127.
View at Google Scholar31.Soemarwoto, O. 1987. Homegardens: a traditional agroforestry system with a promising future. In: Steppler H.A. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Agroforestry: A decade of development, ICRAF, Nairobi, pp. 157-170.
View at Google Scholar32.Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for estimation of available N in soil. Current Science, 25: 259-260.
View at Google Scholar33.Suyal, S., Sharma, C.M., Gairola, S., Ghildiyal, S.K., Rana, C.S. and Butola, D.S. 2010. Phytodiversity (Angiosperms and Gymnosperms) in Chaurangikhal forest of Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(3): 267-275.
View at Google Scholar34.Toky, O.P., Kumar, P. and Khosla, P.K. 1989. Structure and function of traditional Agroforestry Systems in the western Himalaya. I. Biomass and productivity. Agroforestry Systems, 9(1): 47-70.
View at Google Scholar